top of page

What You're Actually Paying For While a Role Sits Open

Sep 8
2 min read

Updated: Sep 12

There's a version of the hiring math that most businesses run. Salary plus benefits plus recruiting costs. That's usually where it stops. The number goes into a spreadsheet and it looks manageable, so the process moves forward.

What almost never gets counted is the cost of the window between posting the role and actually having someone doing the work.

For a marketing hire, that window is longer than most people expect. The average time from posting to accepted offer runs 45 to 60 days. Then there's a notice period. Then 30 to 90 days before a new hire is genuinely up to speed and making decisions on their own. Add it up and you're looking at 3 to 5 months where the role exists on paper but the work isn't getting done.

Three to five months of no marketing isn't

Hidden costs of an unfilled marketing role at a small business — lost time, missed revenue, and team strain
Business owner stretched thin handling marketing alone while a role sits vacant
Calendar marking weeks without a marketing hire, representing mounting opportunity cost
Fractional marketing team stepping in as a cost-effective alternative to a full-time marketing manager

a gap. It's a decision with consequences.

What's actually happening during those months

The work doesn't pause while you're hiring. Campaigns still need to run. Content still needs to go out. Someone on your team is probably picking up the slack, which means something else they were supposed to do isn't getting done.

There's also the stuff that doesn't happen at all. The blog posts that don't get written. The campaigns that don't launch. The leads that don't come in because the top of the funnel went quiet while you were screening resumes.

Marketing has compounding effects in both directions. When it runs consistently it builds. When it stops, things don't just stay flat — they actually start to slide.

The question most businesses don't ask early enough

At some point during the hiring process, it's worth asking whether you need a full-time employee or whether you need what a full-time employee is supposed to produce. They're different things.

One gets you a headcount, a salary line, and a single skill set. The other gets you marketing that runs. For a lot of businesses, especially ones that are still figuring out what their marketing should look like, there's a faster and cheaper way to get to the second thing.

That's not an argument against hiring. There are businesses where a full-time marketer is exactly the right call. But if you're three months into a search and nothing is moving in the meantime, it might be worth asking if there's a better way to run this.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page